The Chance to Try: How India is Rethinking Education

In 2018, Bollywood produced a film called Hindi Medium, a comedic, heart-warming take on class issues in Indian education.  Centering around a young, upwardly mobile family, the plot thickens as the parents do all that is humanly possible to secure a place for their child in a private school.  They are adamant that their daughter continue to climb the ladder to high society, which hinges on not being subject to the sub-par education that a public school typically affords.

It was a fitting release for that year, as a tri-partite public-private partnership to develop the labor force needed for the next decades was formally established that fall.  A problem highlighted in a report published by the World Economic Forum was that India’s workforce faced a huge skills gap—a problem that loosely translated into not reaching the potential of economic growth.

In June of 2017, the Economist ran an article about the impressively mediocre education system in the world’s largest democracy, pointing out that “primary school enrollment is nearly universal…[W]hile learning is not.” According to this article, a handful of participants in the 2009 PISA exam had scores that showed five years of learning gap between other nations in East and Southeast Asia.

While inequality in education has an inextricable tie with opportunity and upward mobility, perhaps the first discussion and policy plan for Indian education needs to be addressing quality of learning.  In fact, a 2019 editorial discussing Modi’s most pressing policy preferences listed those concerns as environment, education, and administration.  According to this report, despite overall improvement in school facilities and a small uptick in learning levels, less than half of the students were reading at grade-level, and of the entire surveyed demographic, less than a third were able to do basic mathematics.  The World Economic Forum correlates the lack of employment skills with an education system that prioritizes theoretical and conceptual work over tangible and practical knowledge gathering.  In early October of 2018, the World Economic Forum, in conjunction with Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship of India and the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Infosys launched a public private task force to not only measure learning outcomes, but also to increase the efficacy of processes.  More data on the task force remains to be seen.  “It is easy to ascribe such poor outcomes to low government spending on education…[A] disproportionate share of that, too, has gone to higher education, to ensure that India has a trained elite to run the country,” declares the Economist.  Yet economists and academics alike believe that throwing money at the problem will not address the root culture and structure of education, which, like the US, is exam-focused.

In the film, the principal of Delhi Grammar school gives an almost insensitive speech about education rights, just after the protagonist parents are revealed to have placed their daughter in the class fraudulently.  Assuming the juxtaposition in this climactic moment hasn’t been lost on the audience, Modi’s policy effectiveness will be closely monitored in his tenure as prime minister.  A member of another BRIC national on exchange to the United States sums up Modi’s position entirely:

“We need schools, we need hospitals…Our country needs to give everyone the chance to try.”

Julia Robinson Math Festivals: Making Math Cool Again

As the mission of Yours Humanly is to “empower underprivileged children in underserved communities around the world by providing access to educational programs and resources,” what could be better than an educational program that bolsters engagement from those very communities?  So today, we’ll be talking about the Julia Robinson Mathematics Festival, and how it’s attracting more people to math. 

It is a great pity that the very idea of “math” conjures visceral dislike.  Often associated with confusing formulas, endless proofs of the obvious, and buckets of tears, one observer casually (and a bit sarcastically, perhaps?) mentioned that “there are three kinds of people in the world.  Those who can count, and those who can’t.” 

The Julia Robinson Math Festival (JRMF) is erasing those smudged ideas.  With a focus on hands-on solving—think cutting paper and counting edges or building with coins and golf balls—the festival offers a plethora of mind bogglers and puzzles that anyone can enjoy.  Here’s a sample problem by Martin Gardner, author of the Mathematical Games column for Scientific American:

Four golf balls can be placed so that each ball touches the other three.  Five half-dollars can be arranged so that each coin touches the other four.  Is it possible to place six cigarettes so that each one touches the other five?  The cigarettes must not be bent or broken.

A recap article from a recently held festival offered a bite-sized introduction to the history and focus of the festival.  “Founded in 2007 by Silicon Valley native and math puzzle enthusiast, Nancy Blachman, JRMFs are collaborative, community-friendly mathematics festivals intended to serve as an alternative to competitions for getting students — especially girls and underrepresented minority students — and their surrounding communities engaged in mathematics.” 

The woman for whom the festival is named, Julia Robinson, was an exceptional mathematician and former professor at the University of California, Berkeley.  Nominated to the National Academy of Sciences and former president of American Mathematical Society, Robinson is famous for her contributions to solving Hilbert’s Tenth Problem.  Hilbert’s Tenth Problem was an infamous puzzle that perplexed the best and brightest since the question was posed in 1900. 

               A product of American cultural values such as creativity and novel pedagogical applications, the festival measures success by how long a participant sticks with a problem, and how deep they go into their explorations.  Success can also be measured by how quickly and how broadly the ideas of the festival have taken off in the most diverse of places.  “Fun math” can and should be widely accessible, and this festival is making every effort to stand behind that belief.  Anyone can host and organize a festival, and the director of festivals, and resources are readily provided, stretching the reach of the festival far beyond the affluent areas of its birth.  Dr. Hector Rosario, festival director, recently edited a book about mathematical outreach, a collection of papers describing situations where he and his colleagues were able to bring math to unlikely places and communities. 

We at Yours Humanly hope to empower more students to attend these festivals! 

Check out the Julia Robinson Mathematics festival here:

https://www.jrmf.org/history

Check out Brianna Donaldson’s article on one of the Bay Area festivals here:

Check out some math puzzles—including the one above!

Gardener, Martin My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles 1994, Dover Publications

Check out how Yours Humanly is supporting education:

Multi-lingual education in Singapore

Singaporean education is world renowned, but what makes it such a great place?  And what would be the first step to re-creating that system anywhere?

Let’s look at only one facet of Singaporean education—mandatory mother tongue instruction.  One of Singapore’s greatest strengths lies in its cultural diversity that stretches back to its roots.  This particular 719 square kilometres has been subject to colonialism by no less than three different colonizers over its 193-year-old modern history.  As such, the light motif of multi-culturalism has inextricably woven itself into the fabric of the nation’s collective consciousness. 

The government, in a laudable effort to maintain this legacy, introduced a policy mandating bilingual education.  Passed in 1966, English would be one of two languages taught, but not necessarily the medium of instruction.  Due to enrollment numbers dropping for non-English medium schools, English became the normal medium of instruction, with courses for Mandarin, Tamil, and Malay offered according to their heritage. 

Singapore’s approach to language planning in the education context followed an instrumentalist theory—language is an instrument, and features can be objectively evaluated to determine the situations in which they would maximize potential. Dr. L. Quentin Dixon, associate professor at Texas A&M wrote in a paper delineating Singapore’s exceptionalism as pertaining to implications for second language acquisition that “a nation can successfully implement widespread education through a non-native medium starting at an early age with little home-language development and achieve good academic results.” 

While this policy was started with the best intentions, it is not without criticism.  A child born in Singapore to Malay parents is ethnically Malay, therefore, they register as Malay and they will have Malay lessons.  If he would prefer to learn Tamil or Mandarin or something else, he won’t be allowed to take that until later in his schooling.  Furthermore, linguistically speaking, English is the mother tongue for many Singaporeans.  Highly respected linguist Dr. Tan Ying Ting has posited that if a governmental policy saying that English is a bona fide mother tongue, “there would no longer be a need for anyone to be tied to an ethnic mother tongue…One can envisage many different alternatives to making language policies more viable in Singapore, and more reflective of our linguistic nuances.”

But perhaps most telling about Singapore’s multilingual approach comes from the citizens themselves.  As cultural tides shift, multilingualism, once seen as burdensome and unnecessary by some, has made a comeback in popularity.  Alvona Loh Zi Hui and Ashton Ng Jing Kai, both Singaporean nationals, wrote for TodayOnline that “bilingualism is essential for confidence in our cultural identities.”

Singapore’s current multi-lingual education stems from its cultural history, its practical sensitivities, and its forecasting of the value of strong cultural identity in the future.  The first step then, in creating an effective multilingual education system, is prioritizing it.  It’s clear that having a multi-lingual society is very important in Singapore, and that they demonstrate that value through enacting real policies that promote this. 

Curious? Want more?

https://www.todayonline.com/voices/no-longer-practical-singaporeans-neglect-mother-tongues  Original op-ed by Alvona Loh Zi Hui and Ashton Ng Jing Kai

https://www.todayonline.com/commentary/what-our-singaporean-mother-tongue?fbclid=IwAR1Tj46duiVJztsqRl6uRIHR3ElrdNiL69bExeBSNDXgvD8VuXYsw0aARnY Original op-ed by Dr. Tan Ying Ting

http://www.lingref.com/isb/4/047ISB4.PDF Original paper published by L. Quentin Dixon, The Bilingual Education Policy in Singapore: Implications for Second Language Acquisition

Field Report: Reading

I’ve been volunteering for an educational non-profit by writing for them. This article originally appears on their website. To learn more, click the link at the bottom of the page!

“Literacy is a bridge from misery to hope. It is a tool for daily life in modern society. It is a bulwark against poverty, and a building block of development, an essential complement to investments in roads, dams, clinics and factories… Literacy is, finally, the road to human progress and the means through which every man, woman and child can realize his or her full potential.”
― Kofi Annan, former Secretary General of the United Nations

Welcome to the Bay Area, California, USA.  This expanse of 10,189 square miles is home to the headquarters of no less than thirty-four Fortune 500 companies, three of America’s best universities, and innumerable pennant-winning sports teams.  It is also home to mind-boggling income disparities, commute times, and educational challenges.  Focusing in on a small corner of this microcosm, today we are looking at literacy efforts in an underserved community within the Bay Area.  Located in the largest city in the largest county of the eastern portion of the Bay Area, the Monument Corridor is almost synonymous with the all-too-real struggle in chasing the American dream. 

To get a better flavor for what challenges are arising in the reading arena, I asked Josue Monterrosa, an educator who practices in the Monument Corridor.

“The parents of these children need to spend a lot of time working.  That limits the time that they can interact with their children.  This limits the amount of words that the children learn in the early years. A limited vocabulary in return limits their literature comprehension. If we compound, and this is not true for all the families, that their academic level might be low, the quality of the conversations at home might also be very basic. Parents are unable to help with homework because of time or knowledge,” he shared over email. 

Most of his students have improved their reading during their first trimester, which is a significant milestone.  “All of the students that improved read at home…All of the students that improved had an adequate improvement.  Sometimes the students in affluent schools improved in spite of having bad teachers. And sometimes the students in our schools have modest improvements not because we are bad teachers or we are not working with them, but because by the time they came to us they were already many years behind. So, some parents consider affluent schools as good schools based on the scores when it might have nothing to do with the school’s efforts to improve the learning of their students.”

As Henry Ward Beecher poetically put it, “we should not judge people by their peak of excellence; but by the distance they have traveled from the point where they started.”  Yours Humanly is committed to providing more resources for schools like Josue’s, so the distance to academic excellence does not become unattainably long.  We hope you will join us for the ride. 

To get involved, give us a call or send us an email!

http://www.yourshumanly.org